Page 34 - IB October 2021
P. 34

Opinion                                                                                                                                                                                                     Opinion

                         FRAMING A ‘NEW PACIFIC

                                     CONSCIOUSNESS’



         By Kaliopate Tavola                                 cally support critical issues like environmental vulnerabilities,
                                                             climate change, disaster risks, economic and pandemic shocks
          Outgoing USP Chancellor, H.E. President of Nauru Lionel   and new normal and moves to digitalisation platforms.
         Rouwen Aingimea, recently penned an editorial, which, having   But that was for the last 50 years. For the next half century,
         fulfilled his one-year stint as Chancellor and on the way out,   what is important is how the USP handles its affairs at this
         can be regarded as his farewell statement to the USP com-  critical juncture. The ongoing “USP saga” has tested our
         munity .                                            unity as a region. Our integrity, values and respect for an
          The editorial was titled: “USP ‘shaping Pacific futures in the   equal voice at the table will determine the standards that
         21st Century.” In the last 50 years of regionalism, Aingimea   can be collectively harnessed for the good of the Pacific going
         wrote that USP has acquired a wealth of experience in higher   forward.
         education to stand as a pinnacle of Pacific regionalism: it be-  Despite our trials, tribulations, limitations and vulnerabili-
         ing owned by 12 Pacific Island Countries. However, “over the   ties, the USP issues present both challenges and opportunities
         past two years, the very notion of Pacific regionalism has been   for paving a new path for our future generations. Aingimea
         under severe threat as USP has been embroiled in governance   submitted that the USP issues “have called us, as custodi-
         and related issues.”                                ans of the Pacific, to also reflect and reignite what ‘Pacific
          Critical also in shaping Pacific futures is the value of a USP   Regionalism’ means to us.” Clearly, his perspectives were not
         education in “creating opportunities for the citizens of our   restricted to the university as an institution but also to the re-
         Pacific region.” The university itself being “the place to test   gional framework within which the university is a pivotal part.
         ideas and pursue truth. It is also where academic freedom is   In his attempt to expand and expound his views for the






                            Fiji’s planned delay in the remittance of funds to subsidise the fees of
                            its own students is somewhat short-sighted. It lacks foresight. It only
                            jeopardises the education of its own students should USP terminate
                            these students for incomplete payment of fees. Furthermore, such ac-
                            tion jeopardises the viability of the whole university since it affects the
                            greatest number of students.”






         fundamental to the freedom of expression and human rights.”   future, he likened this new reflection to “a new paradigm,
         President Aingimea acknowledged that he has benefitted from   a renewal, a renaissance for our region.” He went further.
         these values as a USP alumnus.                      He wrote “about developing a New Pacific Consciousness for
          The President referred to his tenure at USP as “some of   the 21st century.” Moreover, he associated the century as “a
         the most trying times that USP has faced in its history….  period of great challenges but equally it is an era where we
         particularly at a time when the very future of USP remains at   break the shackles of the past to determine our own future.”
         stake.” But he did not deviate from his task of ensuring that   Whilst he is deeply aware of our challenges, Aingimea is also
         USP continues to shape Pacific futures in the 21st century. He   “cognisant of our rich legacy which is why a new Pacific re-
         was able “to bring about change at the heart of the university   naissance, and a new Pacific Consciousness is essential to deal
         instituting reforms that will make USP stand out in the future   with our seemingly intractable issues.”
         amongst the best universities in the world.” He fought hard to   These concepts can be mind-boggling. But the editorial did
         champion good governance and show leadership.       clarify what a new consciousness implies. There are essen-
          USP’s crucial role in the human resource needs is another   tially two parts to it. First is the formulation of ‘strategies
         aspect by which USP is shaping Pacific futures in the 21st   and mechanisms aimed at delivering our people as well as
         century. Aingimea referred to the 30,000 students in the   our governments from past practices and ways of doing things
         university’s care. They represent “our collective voice for the   that have often made us vulnerable.’ The second is ‘about
         Pacific region.” They speak, advocate, research and techni-  allowing our voices to be heard on the world stage.’


        34 Islands Business, October 2021
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39