Page 32 - IB July 2021
P. 32

Opinion                                                                                                                                                                                                      Opinion



































                                                                              Illustration: Albert Rolls
                 INCLUSIVITY IS EXPEDIENT FOR

                                            PACER PLUS



         By Ambassador Kaliopate Tavola                      istration in the US.  Even the anti-globalism rhetoric of the
                                                             Australian government has cooled. Stephen Dziedzic of ABC
          I wrote: ‘Re-Negotiated PACER Plus for Post-Covid-19 Pacific   wrote last July: “The PM’s ‘negative globalism’ speech seems
         Regionalism’ for the July 2020   issue. This was pitched par-  to have rapidly receding into the distance in the era of
         ticularly at strengthening Pacific regionalism (Pacific Islands   COVID-19. Australian Ambassador to the UN Mitch Fifield says
         Forum) as a means of a counterweight to what had appeared   while the Organization is ‘far from perfect’ it is nonetheless
         at the time as increasing threats to globalism.  Moreover,   ‘indispensable’”.
         strong regionalism is an effective collective means to multi-  Furthermore, PACER Plus itself has been ratified sufficiently
         lateralism for PIF members, especially for the Forum Island   to trigger the implementation phase. A PACER Plus Implemen-
         Countries.                                          tation Unit (PPIU) has been established and is operating out
          I opted for re-negotiating PACER Plus for three reasons.   of Samoa. The Head of the Unit also doubles as Trade and
         Firstly, the trade agreement was not being implemented   Development Adviser who reports to the PACER Plus Joint
         at the time: its ratification target had not been reached.   Committee (PPJC).
         Secondly, Fiji was still engaged in its bilateral negotiations   Moreover, Fiji’s bilateral negotiations with Australia and
         with Australia and New Zealand (ANZ), in the margins, in the   New Zealand seem to have run out of steam.
         hope of improving certain provisions of the then-agreed texts.   The above events, preceding my July 2020 article, may ap-
         Thirdly, I was and still am convinced that the agreement   pear to invalidate the argument for re-negotiating PACER Plus.
         is likely to strengthen desired economic integration in the   Such invalidation is only partial. The third reason I proffered
         region. This would be so especially if it was to be extended to   above: the need to strengthen regional economic integration,
         include the two biggest Melanesian traders of Fiji and Papua   is as critical as ever in Pacific regionalism, particularly as a
         New Guinea.                                         post-COVID-19 incentive. PICs still need strong, integrated and
          I suggested then some ideas that could be considered for   effective regionalism to aid their multilateral interventions.
         re-negotiating some provisions of the agreement that could   Anti-globalism may have faded. But its resurgence cannot be
         convince the two Melanesian traders to sign onto the agree-  just wished away.
         ment.                                                 Strong Pacific regionalism is essentially the aspiration of
          Twelve months on, the situation has changed somewhat.   PIF’s ‘Blue Pacific’ approach and the raison d’étre of the pro-
         COVID-19 still rages on. And the main threat to globalism   posed 2050 Strategy.
         seemed to have vanished together with the Trump admin-  Regional economic integration therefore needs to be


        32 Islands Business, July 2021
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37