Page 34 - IB OCT 2017
P. 34

Opinion                                                                Advertorial         Building champs P37

                                                                                 Advertorial       Health supplements P37
                CLASSIFIEDS                                                                     Islands Business

              Will Fiji evolve towards Pakistan’s



                              model of democracy?




                 By Jone Dakuvula

         THE  statement  in  the  media  by  the
         Chief of Staff of the Fiji Military Forces,
         Colonel Jone Kalouniwai, in September
         criticising the speech of National Federa-
         tion Party MP Parmod Nand, has again
         raised  the  question  of  the  role  of  the
         army in the political and constitutional
         system of Fiji.
          This Essay poses the question wheth-
         er Fiji, is evolving towards the situation
         of a “controlled democracy” like in Paki-
         stan under an imposed 2013 Constitu-
         tion. Does recent history answer this?
          This question was first raised by Colo-
         nel Kalouniwai’s article July 24, 2017 in
         the  Fiji Sun  that  provided  justification
         for Section 131 (2) of the Constitution:   Pakistan’s military coup in 1999 led to a new form of democracy where the military determined how long an
         “It shall be the overall responsibility of   elected government can be tolerated in power. Photo: Pakistan Information Ministry.
         the Republic of Military Forces to ensure
         at  all  times  the  security,  defence  and                         always has inherently a superior value
         wellbeing of Fiji and all Fijians”. This   sovereign  mandate  of  the  people,  to   judgement  to  an  elected  government
         provision did not exist in the 1970 and   whom they are accountable in General   about what policies are for the wellbe-
         1997  Constitutions  that  were  passed   Elections.                 ing, security and defence of the people
         by our Parliament. There was a similar   But  to  some,  however,  Section  131   of Fiji and what are not.
         provision in the decreed Constitution of   means that whenever the RFMF Com-  This  fear  of  future  negative  judge-
         1990 but it was repealed under Section   manders believe that an elected Govern-  ment  against  an  elected  government,
         195  of  the  1997 Constitution. It then   ment is not operating in terms of their   justifying military intervention is rooted
         resurfaced  under  the  decreed  2013   view of security, wellbeing or defence   in  Fiji’s  recent  historical  experience,
         Constitution.  The  Pakistan  situation   interests of Fiji, the RFMF may intervene   especially between 2000 and 2006. Let
         is  where  the  military  and  intelligence   and assume governance of the country   us briefly review some incidents of this
         services are the actual long-term rulers   until it decides a suitable time for an-  history. In 2000 when the elected gov-
         of the country and usually decide how   other Election. A coup will therefore be   ernment was held hostage by Speight’s
         long an elected government can be toler-  always constitutionally justified. This is   group with arms supplied mysteriously
         ated in power?                     how Colonel Kalouniwai in his article in   by  the  RFMF,  the  Commander  and  a
          In my view - as a generous interpre-  the Fiji Sun July 2017 restated Section   group  of  advisers  took  the  President
         tation - Section 131 (2) broadly states   131(2):                    (then the constitutional Commander in
         the  constitutional  responsibility  of  a   “The duty of every Government is to   Chief of the RFMF), Ratu Sir Kamisese
         freely elected government, not a military   ensure the security of its country thus   Mara, out in a patrol boat one night on
         controlled government. This presumes a   the Constitutional mandate of the RFMF   Suva  Harbour  and  asked  him  to  step
         system where the military is under the   of having at all times the responsibility   down  because  they  said  there  was  a
         control  of  a  civilian  government  and   the wellbeing and  defence  of Fiji  and   need to abrogate the 1997 Constitution.
         the  military  permanently  accepts  that   all Fijians”.               Mara was told the Constitution was
         position of subservience. The RFMF no   This  statement  implies  that  if  the   preventing the RFMF from decisive ac-
         doubt is part of the state structure of   elected government is not ensuring the   tion to resolve the hostage situation in
         governance as a disciplined force like   security of the country, then the RFMF   Parliament.
         the police and shares the belief of state   has the “mandate” to intervene at any   Mara  sorrowfully  decided  to  step
         servants  that  they  exist  as  servants   time.  Colonel  Kalouniwai  probably   down.  He said later in a media interview
         of their elected political masters. They   meant any elected government that the   that if the RFMF and Police were not
         serve  for  the  wellbeing,  security  and   RFMF decides to be subservient to for   going to protect him at his residence or
         defence  under  laws  of  the  people  of   a  while.  Section  132  (1)  seems  also   allow him to use the emergency powers
         Fiji.  The  elected  government  has  the   based on the presumption that the RFMF   under  the  1997 Constitution,  then  he


         34 Islands Business, October 2017
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39