Page 10 - IB MAR 2017
P. 10

Cover Story            ‘                          ’
         Township backs mining job opportunities




         n From PAGE 9
          Similar questions were sent to the of-
         fice of the Fiji Director of Environment,
         Sandeep Singh, on the same day we sent
         our questions to Corerega Environment
         Consultancy. We sent her four questions
         relating to the mining of Sigatoka River.
          “1. According to point 6.1.2.1 in the EIA
         Report, the consultants had recommended
         a second EIA to be done. Would you be
         able to tell me whether this recommenda-
         tion was taken up?
          “2. On section 6.2.2.1.1, I also note an-
         other recommendation by the consultants
         that dredging of the Sigatoka River should
         be confined only to the months of May to
         October. Is there a reason why this par-  An excavator digs for sand at the Sigatoka River mouth.                                                    Photo: Samisoni Pareti
         ticular recommendation was not accepted?
          “3. I would appreciate your direction             Mining and royalties
         in identifying whether point 2 i of the
         TOR of the EIA was fulfilled by the con-  THE need to engage with landown-  the dredged spoils to be used as fill
         sultants, that an “ecological and social   ers was raised in the EIA Report of   for reclamation of land to be used
         baseline  environments”  should  have   the proposed mining of Sigatoka   for extension of village boundaries
         been established. My reading of the EIA   River.                     could prompt the land owners to
         Report seems to suggest that no baseline   “The developer is to acquire the   give their land free for use as dump
         was produced.                        approval of the (land) owning unit   sites and roads to dump sites.
          “4. Finally, the risk of “serious poi-  for the waiving of the customary   “The natural resources within
         soning” was raised in section 5.1.1.8,   fishing rights wherever applicable   the development site provide a rich
         where unspecified “contaminants” were   and a suitable and appropriate   resource.
         mentioned by the EIA consultants. Is the   amount of money is to be paid out   Over 80 per cent of the area
         Department aware of what these “con-  to them if deemed necessary for the   within the proposed mining zone
         taminants” are and what are the levels of   partial or total loss of their fishing   is classified as being part of the
         risks in serious poisoning?”         area to the project,” states section   iQoliqoli or customary fishing
          When the magazine followed up on our   6.5.4 of the Report.         ground which extends offshore into
         questions with the Environment Director’s   Landowners were also mentioned   the bay region and as such, it plays
         office, we were advised that the questions   in the use of their land for the   an important role in the subsistence
         have been sitting in the inbox of the Di-  mine’s dump sites.        and artisanal fishery of the nearby
         rector’s official emails. We were told that   “Further incentive could be   local communities.
         the questions should have been directed   discussed through a forum of some   “The river mouth and sand bank
         first to the Department’s media liason of-  sort if the developer and landown-  deposit areas are a daily favourite
         ficer who would then seek the approval of   ers agree to form one and use it as   fishing grounds for many Indo-Fi-
         the Environment minister first before the   a means of addressing issues of im-  jians living at Kulukulu settlement
         director could respond to our questions.  portance to them. Maybe allowing   using fishing poles and nets.”
           Some residents of the town of Sigatoka
         which sits on the banks of the Sigatoka
         River have expressed concern about the   It said it surveyed 117 people, of whom   munity. The positive contributing factors
         interest by Dome to mine the river. They   75 were male and 42 were females.   as mentioned by respondents include em-
         specifically worry about its impact on   “Support for the dredging of the Siga-  ployment opportunity, improve on existing
         river life as well as to the coastline given   toka River was overwhelming during the   financial status and increase fish yield and
         the heavy dependency of the region in   survey,” said the EIA Report.   catch since dredging will be carried out.”
         tourism.                            “Ninety-five (96%) per cent of the re-  “Impact of dredging to the fisheries re-
          Sigatoka Town sits right in the middle   spondents support the development. The   sources will be more on the positive side,”
         of Fiji’s Coral Coast, a mecca of the coun-  main concern is the flooding which has   the EIA Report went on to observe. “The
         try’s tourism industry hosting several five   been a frequent occurrence during the   increase in volume of water means more
         star resorts including the Australian PGA   heavy rain period. The other 4 per cent   fishes can be contained. There are other
         sanctioned golf course at Natadola.  need further information on the mining   causes of depletion to fish stocks that are
          The Corerega’s EIA Report spoke glow-  development process to make an informed   on-going that need to be addressed than
         ingly  of  the overwhelming  support of   decision on supporting the development.”  any effects of dredging to fishery resources
         residents and villages that live by the river   “All respondents agreed that the mining   of the Sigatoka River.”
         for the proposed Dome mining.      project will be of great benefit to the com-  r spareti@islandsbusiness.com


         10 Islands Business, March 2017
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15