Page 32 - IB July 2020
P. 32

Opinion                                                                                                                                                                                                      Opinion

                 RE-NEGOTIATED PACER PLUS FOR

           POST-COVID-19 PACIFIC REGIONALISM


         By Ambassador Kaliopate Tavola                      also needs to critically think about its own strategy given the
                                                             disunity that reigns within. There is disunity in PIF’s stance
           Globalism is being threatened in the post-Covid-19 global   on climate change. There may also be disunity as regards
         order. However, there is still ample common sense around   PIF’s stance on the disintegration of globalism. Australia,
         to counter such a threat. Those engaged are still at an early   for instance, is known for having attacked the UN last year,
         stage in their coordinated countermove. They are likely to   speaking against ‘negative globalism’ and ‘unaccountable
         attract reinforcements to ensure some semblance of the   international bureaucracies.’ PIF needs the global pathway. It
         familiar multilateralism in the interest of global orderliness   should be its core geostrategy.
         and of humanity in general. During this period of enforced   At the practical level, PIF needs to double and treble its
         unsettledness, regionalism, e.g. Pacific regionalism (Pacific   efforts at integration and especially economic integration. I
         Islands Forum – PIF) will need to be strong, active and react   have written at length about the delayed economic integra-
         as effectively as is possible, to avoid any major setback in   tion amongst the Pacific Island Countries (PICs) as regards
         members’ economic, social and geo-political status. This is   Pacific Island Countries Trade Agreement (PICTA). The same
         critical given that the majority of PIF members are vulner-  scenario can definitely be said about integration between
         able, small island developing states - globally characterised as   the PICs, on one hand, and Australia and New Zealand (ANZ),
         developing or least developed countries.            on the other hand, under the PACER Plus trade agreement.
           The US under President Trump, with its nationalistic and   This trade agreement is yet to be implemented. However,
         autarkic ‘Make America Great Again’ is leading the charge for   the demand on its deliverables for economic integration has
         the disintegration of globalism. Its newest trade armament,   intensified under current circumstances to warrant immediacy
         brought about by COVID-19, straddled new heights of aggres-  of action. And I believe that the opportunity desperately
         sive protectionism. So much so that a new trade lexicon has   beckons.
         been coined to mark its undignified entrance. ‘Sicken Thy   When the collective negotiations on PACER Plus were de-
         Neighbour’ relates to US’s export restriction (and even diver-  clared concluded to facilitate signing, Fiji opted to continue
         sion) of medical products to deserving importing countries   negotiating. There was no dissension on this matter. Fiji was
         for, inter alia, protectionist reasons. The new lexicon joins its   upfront as regards its intention to improve some aspects of
         equally nefarious ‘Beggar Thy Neighbour’ to take autarky and   the ‘agreed texts’. The bilateral negotiations thus ensued and
         protectionism to a new level.                       have yet to be declared closed.
           The counter-movers to recapture lost grounds from global-  This article endorses the need for greater economic
         ism have globalisation and multilateralism at heart. Despite   integration within PIF to raise its profile in addressing the
         the downsides of globalisation, they believe that a multi-  disintegration of globalism. Therefore, PIF needs to sanc-
         lateral approach to solving humanity’s challenges, including   tion the continued negotiations on PACER Plus with the view
         existential threats like climate change, can only be effec-  of attributing the trade agreement with all the concessions,
         tively addressed at the global level. A number of great world   special and differential treatments, waivers and derogation
         thinkers share the same view. Historian Yuval Noah Harari, for   possible to render maximum benefits especially to the PICs.
         example, believes that the three challenges he identified for   This can all be done with the requisite dosage of political
         the world, viz: ecological collapse, technological disruption   will, by both Australia and New Zealand, the two developed
         and nuclear war, can only be resolved at the global level.   country members of PIF.
           For PIF members, especially the 16 Pacific Island Countries,   The opportunity should also be taken to effectively engage
         Pacific regionalism is a critical pathway and an effective   with Papua New Guinea (PNG) in the extended negotiations.
         collective tool linking them additionally to the multilateral   PNG had opted out of the earlier negotiations. In the context
         framework. Strong, active and effective regionalism will   of Pacific regionalism, there is just no logic to having a trade
         complement national initiatives to benefit through regional   agreement with ANZ without the biggest economy of all the
         outputs and outcomes. Further, through Pacific regionalism,   PICs involved. From statements released from Port Moresby,
         PIF members can aspire to increasing levels of integration   it can be appreciated that the issues of concern to PNG are
         amongst them and PICs especially can effectively exercise   similar to those that Fiji had highlighted.
         their collective innate agency on global issues that matter   Additionally, Vanuatu’s concern about lost tax revenue re-
         to them. At the multilateral level, they would benefit from,   sulting from hasty and hefty tariff reduction, can also be ad-
         inter alia, the articulation of reasoned, effective and efficient   dressed with more concessionary tariff reduction scheduling.
         advocacy of critical global issues.                 This may require, firstly, reviewing the contents of Vanuatu’s
           For Pacific regionalism, therefore, it is now a critical time   allowable schedule of protected goods and services. Secondly,
         for self-analysis. PIF needs to step up its game in order to   it may also need increased tolerance level as regards the
         raise its levels of aspiration. The post-COVID-19 new normal   definition of ‘substantial part of the trade’ – to be subjected
         demands this. Apart from the propitiousness of timing, PIF   to trade liberalisation under the agreement.

        32 Islands Business, July 2020
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37