Page 25 - IB July 2020
P. 25

Climate                                                                                          Climate


        housing and other social needs. It draws on the idea that   have to decide what is good for them. That’s an approach that
        human well-being and socio-economic resilience will benefit   has failed considerably.”
        from a healthy environment, with a supply of fresh water and   Nunn said the paper in Nature Climate Change documents
        other natural resources.                            the amount of knowledge and understanding in Pacific island
         Over the last five years, SPREP has been trialling this ap-  communities that should be brought to bear on these prob-
        proach through the Pacific Ecosystems-based Adaptation to   lems.
        Climate Change (PEBACC) project. Working with communities   “I’d argue that Pacific island communities have a lot of nat-
        in Fiji, Vanuatu and Solomon Islands, PEBACC has promoted   ural resilience and local knowledge,” he said. “But they are
        ecosystem-based adaptation as a central response to climate   reluctant to express their knowledge or privilege it, especially
        change. This approach acknowledges that damage to both   in a foreign language, so the default position for many donors
        ecosystems and community resilience can come from combi-  is that the community is helpless. This study and other studies
        nation of climate change as well as non-climate sources such   have shown that this is simply not the case. There is a need to
        as pollution, inappropriate coastal development or over-  acknowledge community understanding and knowledge, and
        fishing.                                            to let them drive their own responses. As donors, we can offer
         For Nunn, Pacific communities have been adapting to the   financial resources or information as required, but basically
        natural environment over the centuries. They can build on   change is going to be bottom-up rather than top-down.”
        this tradition as environmental change moves faster because
        of sea level rise and other adverse effects of climate change.  Sustainability a challenge
         “Ecosystem-based Adaptation is looking to nature, it’s look-  The research study used five measures for the evaluation of
        ing to the things that exist in the environment that you can   each project: appropriateness, effectiveness, equity, impact
        use to adapt,” he told Islands Business. “It could be as simple   and sustainability. It argues, however, that “sustainability can
        as re-planting mangroves or not cutting down mangroves in   be the most difficult to achieve because it needs to stand the
        the first place. It could be not cutting down the fringe of   test of time – there can be short-term benefit but poor long-
        coastal vegetation from the front of your coastal community.   term impact.”
         “It’s been these mangroves that have protected coastal   “In our study, we found that most governments and donors
        communities from large waves, storms and other extremes of   believed that their projects were sustainable,” he said. “But
        weather. When mangroves are cut down, this is in effect an   in most cases, we found that wasn’t so. In rural Pacific island
        increased exposure of coastal settlements to these kinds of   contexts, sustainable adaptation depends on community buy-
        climate driven extremes, which is exacerbated other issues   in and community support. You’ve got to respect the commu-
        like sea level rise.”                               nity’s understanding of the natural environment, even though
                                                            it may not be perfect and it may need to be enhanced.
         Top-down or bottom-up?                               “Throughout all the projects we studied, when a donor
         For the Queensland research team, there was one crucial   comes in and says ‘here is $50,000 to do a project’, the com-
        finding – the need for donors to support bottom-up rather   munity is very happy! But when the money dries up after the
        than top-down initiatives: “Our analysis suggests the need   three-year donor cycle, the project collapses because the
        for a praxis shift whereby adaptation is locally led, communi-  community associates adaptation with cash.”
        ties drive their own agendas, and donors and implementers   Many Pacific governments have sought financial resources
        become facilitators that resource the diverse capacities of   through multilateral mechanisms like the Green Climate Fund
        communities and help achieve local objectives equitably.”  or Global Environment Facility. But Nunn argues the substan-
         Patrick Nunn acknowledges the value of extensive work on   tial funding that has flowed into the Pacific Islands region for
        climate adaptation across the region over many years, but   climate change adaptation has made little progress towards
        worries that many donors still use project templates that are   intended objectives, and that funding may dry up in the
        not appropriate for small island developing states.  future.
         “The problem with a top-down model, when it is applied   “We’ve got to move beyond cash,” he said. “In ten years’
        uncritically in the Pacific by donors, is that you can pass   time, when the cost of domestic climate adaptation in Austra-
        legislation, but most Pacific island governments don’t have   lia skyrockets, Australia is going to have much less money to
        the necessary capacity to enforce that legislation,” he said.   give for adaptation in Pacific island countries. The sooner Pa-
        “Donors pour money into the development of top-down adap-  cific island countries learn to do their own adaptation which is
        tation strategies, but largely it’s ineffective. It hasn’t created   effective and sustainable, the better. There is no alternative
        any sustained adaptation to climate change.         than to empower communities to develop their own adapta-
         “At community level, there is often a great understanding   tion strategies.”
        of the natural environmental processes that are causing prob-
        lems – like sea level rise or storm surges. But governments   The study can be found at: McNamara, K.E., Nunn, P, Clis-
        aren’t really interested in listening to that because govern-  sold, R., Westoby, R. et al: “An assessment of community-
        ments, like their donor partners, privilege Western/global   based adaptation initiatives in the Pacific Islands”, Nature
        knowledge. You often find an attitude amongst donors that   Climate Change, 10, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-
        people on the ground can’t understand these processes, so we   020-0813-1

                                                                                              Islands Business, July 2020  25
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30