Page 24 - IB June 2019
P. 24

Opinion





























               Pacific Islands Forum leaders with United Nations Secretary General António Guterres in May 2019   Photo Credit: Supplied: Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat

               United States of the Pacific



                                                                    the Pacific and our commitment to progress the implementation
                                                                    of the Paris Agreement.”
                                                                     Sopoaga’s resentment is particularly piqued by the fact that
                                                                    Australia had “exported $66 billion in coal last year, making it
                                                                    (its) most valuable traded commodity.” This is not in the true
                                                                    spirit of the Boe Declaration, he feels. ABC reported his statement:
                          By Ambassador Kaliopate Tavola            “The more (Australia fails to be) serious about cutting coal and
                                                                    exporting this for money, the more problematic the issue of global
                                                                    warning and the more we have to adapt.”
               THE derivation of the ‘United States of the Pacific’, (USoP), an   It was in this context when Sopoaga proposed: “the establish-
               optional conceptual supra-state construct for the 48-year old   ment of a Pacific supra-state, along the lines of the European
               Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) is reminiscent of the Lae Rebellion of   Union (EU), that is based on cooperation and integration, perhaps
               1965. The rebellion marked the break-away by five Pacific Island   into some form of United States of the Pacific.” This supra-state
               Countries (PICs) from the South Pacific Commission (SPC, now   will comprise ‘small Pacific Island nations’ and its raison d’être
               rebranded as the Secretariat of the Pacific Community) and the   is “to amplify their concerns about climate change on the global
               creation of the South Pacific Forum in 1971.  The brief for the   stage.”
               new regional structure is the now-familiar lament of PIC leaders   Reflecting the Lae Rebellion, Sopoaga’s strategic move is to
               for greater commitment to addressing climate change. The USoP   break from the configuration that constitutes the PIF currently
               may evoke grandiosity. But as a prospective regional architectural   to that of the USoP.
               structure, it is not unprecedented; and its time may have come.  The specific architecture of the USoP is a matter of conjecture.
                 It is a rebellion of sorts. Tuvalu Prime Minister Enele Sopoaga   It is clear however that it would be a forum of only PICs.  What
               is not a happy camper. He takes serious exception to the sug-  is unclear is whether it is intended as a form of regionalism or
               gestion by former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd that   federalism or some other variants of the latter.
               Pacific islanders of Tuvalu, Kiribati and Nauru swap Australian   However, the references to the new entity being ‘based on
               citizenship for maritime resources owned by them. Rudd reckons   cooperation and integration’ and exhibiting aspects of the EU,
               that this would be a long-term solution, in any case, for the three   are hints strongly suggesting regionalism and not federalism or
               PICs that are likely to go under with rising sea levels.  any of its variants.
                 Since such a suggestion requires these PICs to surrender their   It can be taken therefore that USoP would be an only-PICs/
               respective sovereignty through involuntary constitutional chang-  PSIDS forum.  This is reminiscent of course of the 1971 SPF
               es, Sopoaga castigates the suggestion as being neo-colonialist   that started off as a two-caucus configuration – one for the five
               and ‘imperial thinking.’ In Sopoaga’s mind, this suggestion is   PICs and the other for Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). That
               a ‘red herring’ that does not even pretend to solve the problem   configuration was determined after the five PICs opted to include
               at hand.                                             ANZ in their new break-away forum. But the two-caucus ap-
                 Furthermore, the ire of the good PM is heightened after he   proach became a single caucus approach in 1972. Australia, in-
               notes that such a demeaning suggestion is coming from Australia   terestingly, was the force behind the merger of the two caucuses.
               after the signing of the Boe Declaration in 2018 by PIF Leaders     That was then.  The direction the current altercation is taking
               in which climate change is reaffirmed as the “the single greatest   appears to be single-mindedly on formation of a PICs/PSIDS-
               threat to the livelihoods, security and wellbeing of the peoples of   only forum. And that is essentially on basis of its intended


               24 Islands Business, June 2019
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29